2021/02/28 § Leave a comment
I’ve been making little printed chapbooks to leave in the little street libraries around Hobart and Tasmania.
Here is a list I of those so made, or re-made, particularly at the beginning of covid-19 restrictions last year
Wombwell fiction: Algorithm for flowers (2019) and I want a mechanical echidna. (2019 or 2009 original)
Fiction : Residue Solution, 2016. And Once, 2020.
Architecture: Notes on “Roy Grounds‘ ” Courtyard house & Bernard Rudofsky. 2018.
Evolution and morality: Why we should : an introduction by memoir into the implications of the egalitarian
revolution of the Paleolithic, or, anyone for cake? 2019. Available at academia.edu
2016/01/06 § Leave a comment
Moving along, that bubbly blonde with some dead man’s hat on the hair above her head, strays moving in the air like the laugh of the cut man’s son in, with — I know her style but I am not sure of her type — within the kind of fun loving slink and jig in the corner of her wants. Yes, she needs no introduction, you know. There are twenty more upstairs in the store looking for someone special. You don’t know who she is.
Watching & writing in the void at MONA 8th Oct 2015
2014/09/19 § Leave a comment
References, Please by Tim Parks | NYRblog | The New York Review of Books – Simply, it’s time to admit that the Internet has changed the way we do scholarship and will go on changing it. There is so much inertia in the academic world, so much affection for fussy old ways. People love getting all the brackets and commas and abbreviations just so.
2014/05/25 § Leave a comment
While writing Bombastic Distributor, about how simply searching the web is a now a form of publishing, out came a couple of news stories which underlined and re-fram this claim.
A ruling forcing Google to remove search results has been described as “astonishing” by Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales. The European Courts of Justice ruled on Tuesday that an individual could demand that “irrelevant or outdated” information be deleted from results. Mr Wales said it was “one of the most wide-sweeping internet censorship rulings that I’ve ever seen”.
Notice that it is the engine providing search results not the old webpages which hold the outdated and irrelevant information which is held responsible.
“If you really dig into it, it doesn’t make a lot of sense. They’re asking Google… you can complain about something and just say it’s irrelevant, and Google has to make some kind of a determination about that. That’s a very hard and difficult thing for Google to do – particularly if it’s at risk of being held legally liable if it gets it wrong in some way. Normally we would think whoever is publishing the information, they have the primary responsibility – Google just helps us to find the things that are online.”
This makes sense as an old world argument, except I’d argue that the search returns as much a form of publishing as the original webpage makers are (and even any web-search itself).
The medium became the message a while ago, but now everything is publishing. The product is the advert, the reference is the real, the search for data is the information, if not the wisdom.
The other story is more about where everything, the internet of everything, is heading. The web search is a form of publishing because it is all part of a secret herbs and spices recipes of algorithms and past results which have an economic impact. This impact is at a base level of economic activity, and it already structures our lives. The other story is about a set of algorithms in corporate governance.
A venture capital firm has appointed a computer algorithm to its board of directors. The program – called Vital – will vote on whether to invest in a specific company or not. The firm it will be working for – Deep Knowledge Ventures – focuses on drugs for age-related diseases. It said that Vital would make its recommendations by sifting through large amounts of data.
If we can get rid of humans from corporate boards, then we will soon be able to get completely rid of managers, particularly if roboticised labour has already got rid of jobs generally. I.E. if there are no workers, there is no need for managers. If there are no managers there is no need for human governance at all. This venture capital firm is showing the way by putting an algorithm on it’s board. They probably think it is just a marketing lark but really it is very good news.
The end result will be that there will be no difference between the dividend and the dole. No difference between tax and rent.
What were once different can no longer be differentiated, no doubt libertarians will still wank on about their property fetish, no doubt socialists will want to defend workers rights even though no one works, or even consumes, one merely desires this or that, and no doubt the religious will still pray for the poor in spirit that are always with us… but all this is good news.
2014/03/30 § Leave a comment
Wink reviews one remarkable paper book every weekday. “We take photos of the covers and the interior pages of the books to show you why we love them.”
2014/03/29 § Leave a comment
Something useful at The Guardian.
A how-to in 10 points plus Dos and Don’ts. First of a series on this topic.
How to …
• interview a scientist
• write a science feature
• establish a successful science blog
• report from a science conference
• set up a science podcast
• pitch your articles to editors.
However the contest is only for those who live just off Europe in the North Atlantic, but not too far off.
2014/03/25 § Leave a comment
Five years ago, we created @nanoism to be the very first paying publication for literary Twitter fiction, celebrating the very best stories that fit in the cracks of your day. Five years later and Nanoism remains the longest continuously running magazine dedicated to #TwitterFiction of all time. We’ve published nearly six hundred stories from over four hundred writers and inspired people across the world to think big but write small.
Well that sounds a bit over the top, doesn’t it?